It sounds like a awful knock-knock joke, but for Pennsylvania’s York County, it’s no laughing matter: A group determining as “election integrity committee” is unsettling the group, frequently knocking on doors and demanding that people disclose how they voted in previous year’s election.
York Dispatch 1st noted the odd string of doorway-to-door intimidation that seems to be targeting Democrats. In accordance to the paper, many community officers have acquired studies concerning a “committee” banging on doors, inquiring how property owners voted, and for whom. County President Commissioner Julie Wheeler, who has personally received a number of anxious calls and emails, reiterated that this “committee” has no precise affiliation with county government, and has due to the fact turned the make a difference over to regulation enforcement.
Chad Baker, chair of the Democratic Bash of York County, told the Dispatch that “there is an intimidation issue, and that’s what their intent is,” introducing that “the timing of this doesn’t seem suspect presented the current ask for of the audit by Sen. Mastriano.”
In truth, Pennsylvania Senator Doug Mastriano is an ardent help of Former U.S President Donald Trump, owning helped spread the 2 times-impeached politician’s phony claims of voter fraud. And as of this month, the Senator went one phase further: He’s demanding an Arizona-design audit of the 2020 election benefits.
In early July, Mastriano sent letters to three counties — such as York — requesting “information and elements wanted to perform a forensic investigation of the 2020 General Election and the 2021 Key.” Mastriano threatened the international locations with subpoenas really should they fail to comply by July 31. As a result, it is unsurprising that the “committee” is typically banging on the doors of Democrats.
A a little bit comparable predicament played out in Arizona before this yr, and promptly recognised as voter intimidation. Cyber Ninjas, the non-public business conducting Arizona’s audit, proposed the use of very similar doorway-to-door ways, which incited a cautionary letter from the U.S. Office of Justice Civil Rights Division: “This description of the proposed do the job of the audit raises worries relating to prospective intimidation of voters.”
We appear ahead to the DOJ’s ideas pertaining to the “election integrity committee.”